Watch the full episode here:

The Kianistan Podcast sat down with Dr. Alexander Rahr, one of Europe’s most seasoned Russia experts, historian, geopolitical analyst, and former adviser to German policymakers. With decades of experience inside German, American, and Russian institutions — from Radio Free Europe to the German Council on Foreign Relations — Dr. Rahr offers a rare, balanced, and deeply informed analysis of the roots, realities, and future of the Ukraine war.

This episode dives beneath the media narratives to uncover the historical, geopolitical, and ideological drivers shaping the conflict. What emerges is one of the clearest, most nuanced explanations available today.

Russia’s Historical View: A Post-Imperial but Still “Great Power” Mindset

Dr. Rahr explains that Russia no longer seeks a revival of the Soviet Union but views itself as a historic great power with legitimate security interests, especially regarding the Eastern Slavic space — Russia, Belarus, and Eastern Ukraine.

According to him, the roots of the conflict are partly internal to Ukraine, dating back to 1991 when Ukraine inherited large regions that were historically Russian-speaking and culturally aligned with Moscow.

Russia’s strategic objective, as he outlines, is not conquering Europe nor marching toward Poland — but creating a unified Eastern Slavic bloc and ensuring Ukraine does not become a NATO military outpost on its border.

NATO Expansion: The Ignored Red Line

One of the strongest themes from Dr. Rahr is his critique of NATO’s post-Cold War expansion.

He argues that:

  • Russia was never integrated into Europe’s security architecture.

  • Western leaders dismissed Moscow’s warnings on NATO reaching Ukraine.

  • The 2007 Munich speech by Vladimir Putin was a clear indication of the red line.

Dr. Rahr emphasizes that Russia never objected to Poland, Hungary, or even the Baltic states joining NATO, but Ukraine and Georgia were seen differently due to deep historical and cultural ties.

From Moscow’s perspective, the West ignored its existential concerns, underestimating Russia’s willingness to use force.

Ukraine’s Internal Divide: East vs West

Ukraine, he explains, is not culturally or historically homogeneous.

  • Western Ukraine leans strongly toward Europe and Ukrainian nationalism.

  • Eastern Ukraine has deep Russian linguistic, cultural, and familial ties.

According to Dr. Rahr, Ukraine might have avoided war if it had adopted a federal system, allowing regions like Donbas or Crimea significant autonomy. The failure to do this — combined with Western encouragement — deepened internal tensions and pushed the country toward conflict.

Neo-Nazi Groups in Ukraine: Reality vs Exaggeration

While rejecting the Russian propaganda narrative of Ukraine being “full of Nazis,” Dr. Rahr states:

  • There are small ultranationalist groups in Ukraine with roots dating back to WWII.

  • These groups are not representative of the entire country but have played a symbolic and political role, especially in Western Ukraine.

  • The West has downplayed their existence, while Russia exaggerates it.

His assessment is nuanced and avoids both extremes.

European Media & Political Elite: Stuck in Cold War Thinking

One of the most striking observations from Dr. Rahr is his claim that European elites still operate through Cold War psychology, treating Russia as though it was defeated like Nazi Germany in 1945.

He describes:

  • Europe’s inability to treat Russia as a great power.

  • Media’s overly simplistic coverage of Russia, China, Trump, and global geopolitics.

  • The generational shift in European leadership that lacks historical understanding.

This, he argues, has led to catastrophic miscalculations.

Trump’s Return & the Push to End the War

Dr. Rahr believes that President Trump’s main strategic objective is simple:

“Make America great again — not fight endless wars.”

According to him:

  • Trump views the Ukraine war as a drain on U.S. power.

  • Ending the war allows the U.S. to pivot toward facing China.

  • Trump will push hard for a ceasefire — even if it freezes the conflict rather than resolves it.

He predicts negotiations could accelerate in 2025, potentially aligning with symbolic dates like Easter.

Can Russia Trust the U.S. After So Many Broken Agreements?

When asked if Russia can trust the U.S. — given past withdrawals from agreements like INF, JCPOA, and Minsk — Dr. Rahr offers a sobering view:

“We are entering a world without rules.”

He argues that:

  • The post-Cold War Western-led order is collapsing.

  • Emerging powers like China, Russia, Iran, and regional Middle Eastern actors are reshaping global politics.

  • The future will be multipolar, unstable, and unpredictable.

This insight is one of the episode’s most important takeaways.

Conclusion: A Must-Watch Episode for Anyone Seeking Real Insight

This conversation is one of the most objective, balanced, and historically grounded analyses of the Ukraine conflict. Dr. Alexander Rahr provides the rare clarity that is often missing in Western media.

Whether you follow global politics, international relations, or simply want to understand one of the most important conflicts of our time, this episode is essential viewing.

👉 Watch the full episode here: